Yesterday,
a woman came up to my register and wanted to make a return. She gave me her
receipt and a Ziploc bag of earring backs. The packaging for the earring backs
was also in the bag, but it was a mangled mess. We would never have been able
to make sure that all the earring backs that were supposed to be in the package
were there, let alone repackage them for resale. I explained the situation to
her. Her response was to give me a lecture about how the earring backs didn’t
fit the earrings that she wanted to use them with, and she was displeased with
the product. Again I explained that unless there was something inherently
faulty about the product, I couldn’t return it. The fact that she had already
tried them in her ears just aggravated the situation; now, it wasn’t simply a
matter of packaging, it was a matter of hygiene.
She was
very upset with me, and demanded to speak to a manager. When the manager came
over to my register, he agreed with me: there was no way to do the return,
because we would be unable to resell the product. This was also unsatisfactory,
and the lady wanted to speak to the district manager about it. My manager went
round and round with her for a few minutes, and she finally left in a huff
without buying the new item she had picked out and, much to my amusement,
leaving the bag of earring backs for which she had so desperately wanted a
refund.
She’s not
the only one, either. Another woman wanted a refund on a spool of ribbon she
had already used because it had cost more than she originally wanted to pay.
Another customer wanted to return a frame he had bought last week because there
was a better sale on them going on this week. I even had a customer who brought
in her receipt to get a price adjustment on an item that she bought last week
because there was a coupon out this week.
I bring
this up in part because I find it amusingly ridiculous. The first woman bought
a product, opened the product, damaged the packaging, used the product, decided
it wasn’t the product she had intended to buy, thrown the product in a sandwich
bag, and expected me to fix her mistake. Don’t get me wrong, I know that making
returns is a part of my job as a cashier. I’m very good at making returns. I
can tell you the return policy backwards and forwards and probably in my sleep.
I even
respect returns as a means of keeping the retail industry honest to a certain
degree. Returns of items help to make companies responsible for their product:
if it’s faulty, they don’t make any money on it. They’re also a means of
establishing a healthy relationship between a store and its customers: returns
are but one way a store can exhibit good faith and provide outstanding customer
service. Returns should not, however, be a means of allowing customers to screw
the system.
Returns are
not intended for us, as consumers, to be able to buy a product, play around
with it, exhaust its usable life, and then bring it back so that it’s like we
haven’t spent any money on our entertainment. They are also not a means for us,
as consumers, to get the sale prices on items. Believe it or not, it’s a
regular occurrence for people to come in and try to return an item and buy it
again at the sale price. It’s also very common for customers to come in and
want to return an item and purchase it again with a coupon (coupon usage is
another of my pet peeves, but that is itself an entire discussion).
I know a
great many people will think, why not? A penny saved is a penny earned, and
this is a way to save a few pennies. The problem with that is that it kills the
system. I think a certain amount of this behavior comes from not understanding
how retail works.
It costs a
certain amount to make a product. Say, it costs one dollar to produce those
earring backs that the woman discussed earlier wanted to return. The company
who makes them cannot simply sell them for one dollar, because selling
something for the cost of production does not cover such things as maintaining
the building in which the product was produced. So retailers buy the product
from the manufacturer at $1.50. The retailer cannot sell the earring backs for
$1.50 for the same reason the manufacturer cannot sell them for $1.00: the cost
of running a business. Consumers, I think, often think that the price of an
item is all profit. Admittedly, a goodly portion of it is profit. But a bit of
it also goes to pay the person who has to deal with crap like this.
The sale
price of an item cuts into the store’s profitability. If everyone got the sale
price, or the coupon price, on every item, every day, the store would not make
any money. If the store does not make any money, then it cannot pay its
employees. Without employees, a store cannot function, and ultimately closes.
Now that we
have all had our potted economics lesson for the day, let’s talk about the
human factor. When consumers try to get one over on the system like that, it
shows a distinct lack of respect for the employees, such as the part-time
cashier (A.K.A., me). Quite literally, if the store does not make its sales
goals for the week, I get fewer scheduled hours the next week. In other words,
the woman trying to return the earring backs that she had already used and
abused was, albeit unwittingly, but also very selfishly, making it more
difficult for me and my other hourly coworkers to pay rent for the next month.
This goes
back to the societal thinking skills I discussed last week. That lady wasn’t
thinking about me, or my coworkers, or the people in a factory somewhere that
operate the machinery to make the earring backs, or the person who (had we been
able to repackage them) bought the earring backs after her. I’m going to assume
that if she had, she wouldn’t have behaved that way.